Two airlines that have been found to receive government
subsidies are Qatar and Emirates. Both airlines are within violation of the
Open Skies policy. The Open Skies policy is an agreement in place to promote
travel, increase economic growth and promote job opportunities by eliminating
government interference on routes, capacity, and price. Qatar has violated this
policy by receiving government aid with over $16 billion in the last decade
alone. Qatar’s CEO Akbar Al Baker has publicly denied any government interference
with the airline but its financial statements have proven this to be false.
Emirates has shown to have received at least $5 billion in subsidies since 2004
(Partnership for Open and Fair Skies, 2015) . Last year they made
a profit of $1.6 billion of which $700 million was given to shareholders and
$300 million in bonuses for its employees.
Though not in the exact same way as the Gulf airlines the
U.S. government has been providing subsidies to American aviation companies as
well. A government
document shows that $155 billion has been received by U.S. airlines between
1919 and 1998. Of the $155 billion spent, $140 was spent by the trust fund that
supports FAA spending. Historical data from the FAA also shows that since 1971
passengers and airlines have contributed $247 billion to the trust fund with
$10 billion being contributed annually today. Unlike the Gulf airlines the U.S.
airlines pay into what they are given to by the government. The Gulf carriers
argue that many countries subsidize their commercial airline industries,
especially start-ups but they are not exactly parallel events. U.S. airlines
started with mail being carried by airlines and being required to carry
passengers to lead to a reduction in the need for air mail subsidies. Airlines
were provided with more subsidies in the second half of the century. The Gulf
carriers are relatively new. Emirates was founded in 1985, Qatar in 1993, and
Etihad in 2003. Instead of letting the market expand their airlines over time
the Gulf governments spent billions of dollars rapidly to provide the three
airlines with the most expensive aircraft and gigantic new airports (Reed, 2015) .
Another controversial issue with foreign carriers is their
purchasing of aircraft at lower interest rates than U.S. carriers. The
Export-Import Bank, the federal creditor of the United States, is accused of
reducing the investment required to purchase new aircraft for foreign carriers.
The subsidized aircraft are then put onto routes that directly compete with
U.S. carriers. U.S. carriers not receiving the same deal and the Bank’s
activity in the wide body aircraft sector has resulted in job loss for American
airlines (Keep America Flying) . Boeing is currently
the biggest beneficiary of the bank and according to the Government
Accountability Office represents about 28 percent of agency’s financial
exposure. The Bank providing subsidies
to foreign airlines to buy Boeing aircraft has cost the U.S. airline industry
7500 jobs and $684,000 each year (Lee, 2015) .
I feel that a level playing field with foreign carriers could
be achieved but the problem is that it requires everyone to play by the same
rules. Governments often get too involved with commercial business especially
regarding the airlines and there are different beliefs on what is acceptable or
not. In order to have a level playing field the international aviation industry
has to come to a conclusion on what defines a level playing field and follow
the same procedures. The international business community is not fair and I don’t
think it ever will be.
Partnership for Open and Fair Skies. (2015, January 28). Retrieved from Open and Fair Skies: http://www.openandfairskies.com/wp-content/themes/custom/media/White.Paper.pdf
I agree, the government needs to step in at some point so that every other airline has a chance. This is how monopolies are created if there are no other airlines to compete with the remaining airlines will eventually raise prices. At the moment it doesn’t seem that bad but over time it could grow into a big problem one a global scale.
ReplyDeleteYou made some good points in this discussion and I agree with a few the one that stood out to me the most is the comment you made you made about foreign carriers stating "I feel that a level playing field with foreign carriers could be achieved but the problem is that it requires everyone to play by the same rules." I feel that all the carrier should abided by the same rules.
ReplyDelete